The 4 Reasons Why Carlishia Hood Charges Were Dropped
Carlishia Hood and her 14-year-old son were accused of murdering a man at a Chicago hot dog stand.
But in a surprising twist, prosecutors dropped all charges against them.
What ended in this choice?
Here are 4 imaginable reasons.
What came about at Maxwell Street Express, West Pullman group on June 18, 2023?
According to prosecutors, Hood and her son arrived at Maxwell Street Express, a quick meals restaurant in the West Pullman neighborhood, around Eleven p.m.
Hood was in line to get food while her son waited in their automotive.
Shortly after, Jeremy A. Brown, 32, entered the eating place and got into an argument with Hood.
The dispute escalated into a physical fight, with Brown punching Hood in the head multiple occasions.
(*4*)
Hood texted her son and signaled him to come back inside.
The boy took out a gun and shot Brown in the again as he tried to run away. Hood and her son followed him outdoor, the place she allegedly told him to stay capturing and kill him.
She additionally allegedly informed him to shoot Brown’s girlfriend, who was guffawing and encouraging Brown throughout the argument.
The mother and son then fled the scene and drove home.
How were they caught and charged?
The whole incident was once captured by means of high-definition surveillance cameras outside and inside the eating place.
Police launched the footage to the public and asked for lend a hand in figuring out the suspects.
Hood and her son were arrested on June 22, 2023, after being identified by means of Brown’s female friend in photo arrays.
They were both charged with first-degree murder and held without bail.
Hood also confronted a prison count of contributing to the delinquency of a minor.
She had a legitimate firearm owners identification card and a permit to carry a hid weapon.
She had no legal file.
4 Reasons Why Carlishia Hood Case Was Dropped
On June 26, 2023, prosecutors dropped all charges against Hood and her son, mentioning “rising proof” that showed Brown punching Hood sooner than he used to be shot.
The new proof got here from a video that was it appears shot by a bystander and extensively shared on social media.
The video showed a distinct attitude of the altercation inside the restaurant, where Brown can also be seen hitting Hood many times.
Reason 1: Self-defense
Hood and her son claimed that they acted in self-defense once they shot Jeremy A. Brown, 32, on June 18, 2023.
They stated that Brown punched Hood in the head multiple times all the way through an argument at Maxwell Street Express, a fast meals eating place in the West Pullman community.
Hood texted her son and requested him to come inside of.
The boy took out a gun and shot Brown in the back as he attempted to run away.
Hood and her son adopted him outdoor, the place she allegedly told him to stay taking pictures and kill him.
Illinois has a “Justifiable Use of Force” legislation that allows other folks to use drive in self-defense with no duty to retreat, however only if positive prerequisites are met.
These conditions include:
- There was once approaching danger or threat to them, any person else, or their assets;
- The risk used to be illegal;
- They believed that a threat existed that required pressure; and
- They used power that used to be equivalent to the threat.
Prosecutors could have concluded that Hood and her son met those stipulations and were justified in the usage of deadly force to forestall imminent death or nice bodily hurt to themselves or another person.
Reason 2: Video proof
On June 26, 2023, prosecutors dropped all charges in opposition to Hood and her son, citing “emerging evidence” that showed Brown punching Hood prior to he used to be shot.
This new evidence came from a video that used to be it seems that shot by way of a bystander and extensively shared on social media.
The video showed a special angle of the altercation within the restaurant, the place Brown can be observed hitting Hood time and again.
It may have corroborated Hood and her son’s model of events and solid doubt on the credibility of Brown’s female friend, who used to be guffawing and encouraging Brown all over the argument.
She had identified Hood and her son as the shooters in photograph arrays. The video can have additionally influenced public opinion and sympathy for Hood and her son.
Reason 3: Lack of legal file
Hood and her son had no legal document previous to the taking pictures.
Hood had a sound firearm homeowners identity card and a allow to carry a hid weapon.
She was once also charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor for allegedly educating her son to shoot Brown and his girlfriend.
Prosecutors will have regarded as Hood and her son’s blank background and loss of felony intent as mitigating factors in their decision to drop the charges.
They may have also weighed the potential penalties of prosecuting a mom and her teenage son for murder.
Reason 4: Public pastime
The case attracted a lot of media attention and public scrutiny. It also sparked a debate about self-defense rules, gun violence and social media influence in legal justice.
Some folks argued that Hood and her son acted in self-defense and were justified in using deadly pressure.
Others mentioned that they overreacted and must have referred to as the police as an alternative of taking issues into their own palms.
Prosecutors may have determined that pursuing the case was not in the public pastime or the hobby of justice.
They can have also confronted power from anti-violence groups, civil rights activists or neighborhood leaders to drop the charges.
The case stays debatable and unresolved.
It is unclear if there will likely be any civil lawsuits or additional investigations into the subject.
https://youtu.be/OSiarvZw4DQ
ncG1vNJzZmibnq6urMHNnaBnm5%2BifLW0xGZrZqqVlsCwutJmrqGxXZius7jIrJ%2BimV2dvLCwjJyfmqqXmsBuw8SrnGacoqS9sbHDaA%3D%3D